Prevalence of refractive errors in opticians’ shops in the city of Mendoza, Argentina

Authors

  • Rafael Iribarren Consultorio Doctores Iribarren, Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Abel Szeps Liniers Ophthalmological Center, Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Martín de Tomás Internacional Óptica, Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Ricardo Impaglazzo Opticas La Pirámide, Mendoza, Argentina
  • Jos Rozema Visual Optics Lab Antwerp (VOLANTIS), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Antwerp University, Wilrijk, Bélgica. Deptartment of Ophthalmology, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Bélgica
  • Carla Lanca Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde de Lisboa (ESTeSL), Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal. Comprehensive Health Research Center (CHRC), Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70313/2718.7446.v15.n04.189

Keywords:

refractive errors, opticians, risk factors, Mendoza, Argentina

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to estimate refractive errors using spectacle lens sales data in Mendoza, Argentina.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional study which analysed the spectacle lens sales data at La Pirámide optician stores in the city of Mendoza, Argentina. The data provided included age and spherical power, cylindrical power, axis of spectacle prescriptions for distance and the near addition. A descriptive analysis of refractive errors by age (proportions given by percentage) was carried out.

Results: Spectacle lens sales data on total of 12,510 subjects of both genders with an average age of 51.6 ± 22.2 years (range 2-103 years) was included. The mean spherical equivalent (SE) was -0.30 ± 2.16 D and mean near addition was +2.15 ± 0.97 D. In total, 57.6% (n=7,206) of the subjects had astigmatism, 35% had myopia (n=4,375) and 2.86% (n=358) had high myopia. Hyperopia was found in 28.7% (n=3,593) of the subjects, anisometropia was present in 11.8% of the subjects (n=1,479) and anisoastigmatism in 8.4% (n=1,045).

Conclusions: Astigmatism and myopia were present in most of the spectacle prescriptions. Awareness campaigns may be important to inform the community on the burden of vision impairment from uncorrected refractive errors. In addition screening programs for early detection and preventive strategies, such as outdoor programmes, may be necessary.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Pan CW, Ramamurthy D, Saw SM. Worldwide prevalence and risk factors for myopia. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2012; 32: 3-16.

Holden BA, Fricke TR, Wilson DA et al. Global prevalence of myopia and high myopia and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology 2016; 123: 1036-1042.

Rudnicka AR, Kapetanakis VV, Wathern AK et al. Global variations and time trends in the prevalence of childhood myopia, a systematic review and quantitative meta-analysis: implications for aetiology and early prevention. Br J Ophthalmol 2016; 100: 882-890.

Xiong S, Sankaridurg P, Naduvilath T et al. Time spent in outdoor activities in relation to myopia prevention and control: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Acta Ophthalmol 2017; 95: 551-566.

Huang HM, Chang DS, Wu PC. The association between near work activities and myopia in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0140419.

Wong CW, Tsai A, Jonas JB et al. Digital screen time during the COVID-19 pandemic: risk for a further myopia boom? Am J Ophthalmol 2021; 223: 333-337.

Mountjoy E, Davies NM, Plotnikov D et al. Education and myopia: assessing the direction of causality by mendelian randomisation. BMJ 2018; 361: k2022.

Ciner EB, Kulp MT, Vision in Preschoolers-Hyperopia In Preschoolers (VIP-HIP) Study Group et al. Associations between visual function and magnitude of refractive error for emmetropic to moderately hyperopic 4- and 5-year-old children in the Vision in Preschoolers - Hyperopia in Preschoolers Study. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2021; 41: 553-564.

Hashemi H, Iribarren R, Morgan IG et al. Increased hyperopia with ageing based on cycloplegic refractions in adults: the Tehran Eye Study. Br J Ophthalmol 2010; 94: 20-23.

Hashemi H, Khabazkhoob M, Yekta A et al. High prevalence of astigmatism in the 40- to 64-year-old population of Shahroud, Iran. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2012; 40: 247-254.

Fricke TR, Tahhan N, Resnikoff S et al. Global prevalence of presbyopia and vision impairment from uncorrected presbyopia: systematic review, meta-analysis, and modelling. Ophthalmology 2018; 125: 1492-1499.

Moore M, Loughman J, Butler JS et al. The refractive error and vision impairment estimation with spectacle data study. Ophthalmol Sci 2021; 2: 100092.

Sánchez MV, Iribarren R, Latino SG et al. Prevalence of refractive errors in Villa Maria, Córdoba, Argentina. Eye Sci 2016; 31: 68-77.

Cortinez MF, Chiappe JP, Iribarren R. Prevalence of refractive errors in a population of office-workers in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2008; 15: 10-16.

Yang YC, Hsu NW, Wang CY et al. Prevalence trend of myopia after promoting eye care in preschoolers: a serial survey in Taiwan before and during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Ophthalmology 2022; 129: 181-190.

Yang A, Pang BY, Vasudevan P, Drobe B. Eye care practitioners are key influencer for the use of myopia control intervention. Front Public Health 2022; 10: 854654.

Keel S, Govender-Poonsamy P, Cieza A et al. The WHO-ITU MyopiaEd Programme: A Digital Message Programme Targeting Education on Myopia and Its Prevention. Front Public Health 2022; 10: 881889.

Kotlik C, Zaldivar R, Szeps A et al. Myopia and outdoor sports in university students of Mendoza, Argentina. Oftalmol Clín Exp 2021; 14: 96-101.

Zeman L, Danza RD, Fejerman L, Iribarren R. Prevalence of high astigmatism in Salta Province, Argentina. Oftalmol Clín Exp 2021; 14: 162-170.

Harvey EM. Development and treatment of astigmatism-related amblyopia. Optom Vis Sci 2009; 86: 634-639.

de Koning HJ, Groenewoud JH, Lantau VK et al. Effectiveness of screening for amblyopia and other eye disorders in a prospective birth cohort study. J Med Screen 2013; 20: 66-72.

Guo X, Shakarchi AF, Block SS et al. Noncycloplegic compared with cycloplegic refraction in a chicago school-aged population. Ophthalmology 2022; 129: 813-820.

Published

2022-12-26

Issue

Section

Artículos Originales

How to Cite

[1]
2022. Prevalence of refractive errors in opticians’ shops in the city of Mendoza, Argentina. Oftalmología Clínica y Experimental. 15, 4 (Dec. 2022). DOI:https://doi.org/10.70313/2718.7446.v15.n04.189.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 298

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>