Cartillas de lectura en escala logarítmica: ¿por qué el test de Jaeger es obsoleto en el presente?

Rodrigo M. Torres; Juan S. Rivero; Pablo Daponte

doi:10.70313/2718.7446.v16.n04.255

Autores/as

Rodrigo M. Torres Consejo Argentino de Oftalmología, Buenos Aires
Juan S. Rivero Consejo Argentino de Oftalmología, Buenos Aires
Pablo Daponte Consejo Argentino de Oftalmología, Buenos Aires

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70313/2718.7446.v16.n04.255

Palabras clave:

cartillas de lectura, capacidad de lectura, cartilla Byromat, visión cercana, visión intermedia

Resumen

Ver con claridad desde una distancia cercana a nuestra nariz hasta el extremo de nuestros brazos extendidos es relevante durante gran parte del día de un ser humano. Leer es una acción frecuente en la mayoría de las personas. Evaluar la visión de cerca es parte del trabajo diario de un médico oftalmólogo. Conocer cuál es el máximo rendimiento de la capacidad visual cercana de un paciente permite no sólo llegar a detectar patologías oculares sino también aspectos relacionados con procesos neurodegenerativos. Medir correctamente la visión de cerca en la actualidad requiere de la utilización de cartillas desarrolladas en escala logarítmica que estén estandarizadas a nivel internacional. En este trabajo se revisarán algunos aspectos históricos y se describirán las características actuales de las cartillas de lectura en escala logarítmica con el objetivo de estimular su uso en la práctica clínica diaria. Se comentan también las diferencias que existen entre el uso del test de Jaeger y la nueva cartilla de lectura Byromat.

Citas

Heird WC. Infant feeding and vision. Am J Clin Nutr 2008; 87: 1120.

Clark-Gambelunghe MB, Clark DA. Sensory development. Pediatr Clin North Am 2015; 62: 367-384.

Futagi Y. Eye-hand-mouth coordination in the human newborn. Pediatr Neurol 2017; 75: 43-47.

Danna J, Velay JL. Basic and supplementary sensory feedback in handwriting. Front Psychol 2015; 6: 169.

Ptito M, Bleau M, Bouskila J. The retina: a window into the brain. Cells 2021; 10: 3269.

Snyder PJ, Alber J, Alt C et al. Retinal imaging in Alzheimer’s and neurodegenerative diseases. Alzheimers Dement 2021; 17: 103-111.

Bracci S, Op de Beeck HP. Understanding human object vision: a picture is worth a thousand representations. Annu Rev Psychol 2023; 74: 113-135.

Foreman J, Salim AT, Praveen A et al. Association between digital smart device use and myopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Digit Health 2021; 3: e806-e818.

Runge PE. Eduard Jaeger’s test-types (Schrift-Scalen) and the historical development of vision tests. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 2000; 98: 375-438.

Wolfensberger TJ, Hamilton AM. Diabetic retinopathy: an historical review. Semin Ophthalmol 2001; 16: 2-7.

Blanchard DL. Jaeger, about glaucoma. Doc Ophthalmol 1995; 89: 185-191.

González Martín-Moro J, Hernández Verdejo JL, Azurza Rivas G. History and pre-history of optotypes: from Alcor and Mizar to the ETDRS optotype. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol 2016; 91: e91-e92.

de Jong PTVM. A history of visual acuity testing and optotypes. Eye (Lond) August 3, 2022. doi:10.1038/s41433-022-02180-6

Colenbrander A. Consilium ophthalmologicum universale visual functions committee, visual acuity measurement standard. Ital J Ophthalmol 1988; 11: 5-19.

Radner W. Reading charts in ophthalmology. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2017; 255: 1465-1482.

Ntonti P, Mitsi C, Chatzimichael E et al. A systematic review of reading tests. Int J Ophthalmol 2023; 16: 121-127.

Nguyen TX, Ran AR, Hu X et al. Federated learning in ocular imaging: current progress and future direction. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12: 2835.

Li J, Yan P, Li Y et al. Harnessing the power of Raman spectroscopic imaging for ophthalmology. Front Chem 2023; 11: 1211121.

Luo C, Wang H, Chen X et al. Recent advances of intraocular lens materials and surface modification in cataract surgery. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2022; 10: 913383.

Yang F, Dong Y, Bai C et al. Bibliometric and visualized analysis of myopic corneal refractive surgery research: from 1979 to 2022. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 10: 1141438.

Benozzi J, Benozzi G, Orman B. Presbyopia: a new potential pharmacological treatment. Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol 2012; 1: 3-5.

Orman B, Benozzi G. Pharmacological treatments for presbyopia. Drugs Aging 2023; 40: 105-116.

Colenbrander A. Consilium ophthalmologicum universale visual functions committee, visual acuity measurement standard. Ital J Ophthalmol 1988; 11: 5-19.

Labiris G, Ntonti P, Panagiotopoulou EK et al. Impact of light conditions on reading ability following multifocal pseudophakic corrections. Clin Ophthalmol 2018; 12: 2639-2646.

Jainta S, Nikolova M, Liversedge SP. Does text contrast mediate binocular advantages in reading? J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2017; 43: 55-68.

Suptaweeponboon J, Bhornmata A, Tanprasertkul C, Makornwattana M. Comparison of near vision in glaucoma patients using standard and reversed-contrast charts. Clin Exp Optom 2023; 106: 516-522.

Radner W, Obermayer W, Richter-Mueksch S et al. The validity and reliability of short German sentences for measuring reading speed. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2002; 240: 461-467.

Stifter E, König F, Lang T et al. Reliability of a standardized reading chart system: variance component analysis, test-retest and inter-chart reliability. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2004; 242: 31-39.

Sloan LL. New test charts for the measurement of visual acuity at far and near distances. Am J Ophthalmol 1959; 48: 807-813.

Sánchez-González MC, García-Oliver R, Sánchez-González JM et al. Minimum detectable change of visual acuity measurements using ETDRS charts (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study). Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021; 18: 7876.

Künzel SH, Lindner M, Sassen J et al. Association of reading performance in geographic atrophy secondary to age-related macular degeneration with visual function and structural biomarkers. JAMA Ophthalmol 2021; 139: 1191-1199.

Chung STL. Reading in the presence of macular disease: a mini-review. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2020; 40: 171-186.

Stifter E, Weghaupt H, Benesch T et al. Discriminative power of reading tests to differentiate visual impairment caused by cataract and age-related macular degeneration. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005; 31: 2111-2119.

Elliott DB, Patel B, Whitaker D. Development of a reading speed test for potential-vision measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001; 42: 1945-1949.

Soldan A, Pettigrew C, Cai Q et al. Cognitive reserve and long-term change in cognition in aging and preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging 2017; 60: 164-172.

van der Lijn I, de Haan GA, van der Feen FE et al. Reading difficulties in Parkinson’s disease: a stepped care model for neurovisual rehabilitation. J Parkinsons Dis 2023; 13: 1225-1237.

Labiris G, Panagiotopoulou EK, Chatzimichael E et al. Introduction of a digital near-vision reading test for normal and low vision adults: development and validation. Eye Vis (Lond) 2020; 7: 51.

Labiris G, Delibasis K, Panagiotopoulou EK et al. Development and validation of the first smart tv-based visual acuity test: a prospective study. Healthcare (Basel) 2022; 10: 2117.

Karampatakis V, Almaliotis D, Talimtzi P, Almpanidou S. Design and validation of a novel smartphone-based visual acuity test: the K-VA test. Ophthalmol Ther 2023; 12: 1657-1670.