ARTÍCULOS ORIGINALES


Prevalence of glaucoma in a tele-screening program for diabetic retinopathy in rural area of Argentina
Tomás Ortiz-Bassoa-b, María Soledad Córdobab, Ariel Paladinic


a Servicio de Oftalmología, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
b Centro Oftalmológico Santa Rosa, La Pampa, Argentina.
c Dirección de Atención Primaria y Gestión Sanitaria, Ministerio de Salud de La Pampa, Santa Rosa, Argentina.


Recibido: 11 de septiembre de 2022.
Aprobado: 20 de octubre de 2022.

Corresponding author
Dr. Tomás Ortiz-Basso
Escalante 67
(L6300) Santa Rosa, La Pampa, Argentina
tomas.ortiz@hospitalitaliano.org.ar

Oftalmol Clin Exp (ISSNe 1851-2658)
2022; 15(4): e399-e404.

Financial support
Without financial support.

Proprietary interests or conflicts of interest
None of the authors have any proprietary interests or conflicts of interest related to this submission.
This submission has not been published anywhere previously and that it is not simultaneously being considered for any other publication.

Acknowledgments
We thank the Ministry of Health of La Pampa for carrying out the provincial blindness prevention program.


Abstract
Purpose: Diabetes is a controversial risk factor for the development of glaucoma. However, including the early detection of glaucoma within tele-screening programs for diabetic retinopathy continues to be a matter of discussion. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of glaucoma in a tele-screening program for early detection of diabetic retinopathy.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed evaluating the number of people with glaucoma within a population with diabetes. Patients who participated in a diabetic retinopathy tele-screening program taken place in the province of La Pampa (Argentina), were included. A questionnaire was performed to verify the presence of glaucoma and the general characteristics of the participants. In addition, visual acuity with and without pinhole, intraocular pressure with a rebound tonometer, and eye fundus using retinography were evaluated.
Results: A total of 2,743 patients with diabetes were included. The prevalence of glaucoma was 5.0% (95% CI 4.3%-5.9%). A higher prevalence of diabetic retinopathy was observed in people with glaucoma (33.9% versus 21.0%, p 0.001). In addition, through the tele-screening program, 314 people with ocular hypertension were detected.
Conclusion: The prevalence of glaucoma within the studied population was higher than in other studies where the general population was evaluated. Considering that blindness due to glaucoma and diabetes is preventable, it is important to consider the association between both pathologies to implement tele-screening programs.
Keywords: diabetic retinopathy, glaucoma, telemedicine, blindness, primary health care.

Prevalencia de glaucoma en un programa de tele-screening de retinopatía diabética en un área rural de Argentina
Resumen
Objetivo: La diabetes es un factor de riesgo controvertido para el desarrollo de glaucoma. La inclusión de la detección precoz del glaucoma dentro de los programas de tele-screening de retinopatía diabética sigue siendo un tema de debate. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la prevalencia de glaucoma en un programa de tele-screening para la detección precoz de la retinopatía diabética.
Métodos: Se realizó un estudio de corte transversal evaluando el número de personas con glaucoma dentro de una población con diabetes. Se incluyeron pacientes que participaron en un programa de tele-screening de retinopatía diabética llevado a cabo en la provincia de La Pampa (Argentina). Se realizó un cuestionario para verificar la presencia de glaucoma y las características generales de los participantes. Además, se evaluó la agudeza visual con y sin estenopeico, la presión intraocular con tonómetro de rebote y el fondo de ojo mediante retinografía.
Resultados: Se incluyó un total de 2.743 pacientes con diabetes. La prevalencia de glaucoma fue del 5,0% (IC 95% 4,3%-5,9%). Se observó una mayor prevalencia de retinopatía diabética en personas con glaucoma (33,9% versus 21,0%, p=0,001). Además, a través del programa de tele-screening se detectaron 314 personas con hipertensión ocular.
Conclusión: La prevalencia de glaucoma dentro de la población estudiada fue mayor que en otros estudios donde se evaluó a la población general. Considerando que la ceguera por glaucoma y diabetes es prevenible, es importante pensar en la asociación entre ambas patologías para implementar programas de tele-screening.

Palabras clave: retinopatía diabética, glaucoma, telemedicina, ceguera, atención primaria de la salud.

Prevalência de glaucoma em um programa de tele-screening de retinopatia diabética em uma área rural da Argentina
Resumo
Objetivo: O diabetes é um fator de risco controverso para o desenvolvimento de glaucoma. A inclusão da detecção precoce do glaucoma em programas de tele-screening para retinopatia diabética ainda é motivo de debate. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a prevalência de glaucoma em um programa de tele-screening para detecção precoce de retinopatia diabética.
Métodos: Foi realizado um estudo transversal avaliando o número de pessoas com glaucoma em uma população com diabetes. Foram incluídos pacientes que participaram de um programa de tele-screening de retinopatia diabética realizado na província de La Pampa (Argentina). Foi realizado um questionário para verificar a presença de glaucoma e as características gerais dos participantes. Além disso, foram avaliadas a acuidade visual com e sem pinhole, pressão intraocular com tonômetro de rebote e fundo ocular por retinografia.
Resultados: Foram incluídos 2.743 pacientes com diabetes. A prevalência de glaucoma foi de 5,0% (IC95% 4,3%-5,9%). Maior prevalência de retinopatia diabética foi observada em pessoas com glaucoma (33,9% versus 21,0%, p=0,001). Além disso, por meio do programa de tele-screening, foram detectadas 314 pessoas com hipertensão ocular.
Conclusão: A prevalência de glaucoma na população estudada foi maior do que em outros estudos onde a população geral foi avaliada. Considerando que a cegueira por glaucoma e diabetes é evitável, é importante pensar na associação entre ambas as patologias para implementar programas de tele-screening.

Palavras-chave: retinopatia diabética, glaucoma, telemedicina, cegueira, atenção primária à saúde.


Introduction
Glaucoma is the second cause of blindness in the world, and the leading cause of irreversible blindness1. There are 79,000,000 people with glaucoma, and it is estimated that these numbers will continue to grow in the coming years1. Studies carried out in hispanic populations estimate a prevalence between 2.07% and 4.74%2-3. Given that, in Argentina, visual disability due to glaucoma occupies the third place in people over 50 years of age4.
To prevent blindness due to glaucoma, it is essential to make a timely diagnosis and treatment. Thus campaigns or programs for early detection of glaucoma are organized in different areas5. However, these types of programs continue to be a frequent topic of debate because its cost-effectiveness has not yet been proved6. Nevertheless, some authors recommend performing this type of programs in populations with higher risk6.
Risk factors associated with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) are increased intraocular pressure, advanced age, african ascendency, and family history of the disease7-9. Among the risk factors of moderate association are some ocular conditions, such as high myopia and endocrine-metabolic diseases such as diabetes mellitus10-11.
Including diabetes as a risk factor has been controversial, since some studies found a positive association between diabetes and POAG, while others did not12-17. Due to these controversies and the lack of studies in our population, we performed this study which aims to estimate and evaluate the prevalence of glaucoma in diabetic patients of La Pampa province (Argentina).

Materials and methods
A cross-sectional study was performed, with prospective recruitment. Patients with diabetes mellitus who attended a diabetic retinopathy tele-screening program in the province of La Pampa were included. The program covered 59 rural locations in the province, performing retinographies, controlling intraocular pressure (IOP) and visual acuity in all people with diabetes mellitus18-19.
Visual acuity data were obtained without correction and with pinhole, with Snellen decimal scale. IOP values were measured with an Icare ic100 rebound tonometer (Icare Finland Oy, Vantaa, Finland), and eye fundus examination was performed with a Digital Retinography System (DRS) (CenterVue SpA, Padova, Italy). The studies were performed by a trained nurse. The images obtained were analyzed by a single ophthalmologist. The presence of glaucoma was evaluated through a questionnaire. It included general characteristics of the participants and information on quality of life, using the Euroqol validated to Spanish.
Patients who presented an incomplete questionnaire, with non-gradable images in the retinography and who refused the informed consent process were excluded.
The data is presented expressing the categorical variables with whole numbers and proportions, with a 95% confidence interval (CI95%); and numerical variables with mean and standard deviation. The association between categorical variables was made using a chi2 and between numerical variables with a T-test. Logistic regression adjusting for age and sex was performed to assess the association between glaucoma and diabetic retinopathy. A p <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
The following study was evaluated and approved by the Patagonian Independent Ethics Committee and was conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Results
A total of 2,995 people evaluated by the Program were included, of which 24 (0.8%) were excluded for presenting incomplete data and 228 (7.6%) were excluded because they presented non-gradable images, leaving a total of 2,743 people for evaluation.
Of the total number of people evaluated, 5.0% (95% CI 4.3%-5.9%) reported glaucoma, and 11.4% (n314) presented ocular hypertension at the time of evaluation. The mean intraocular pressure was 15.6 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) (SD 4.3) in the right eye and 16.9 mmHg (SD 4.5) in the left eye.
Table 1 summarizes the characteristics presented by the people with or without glaucoma. The main findings were that people with glaucoma had less visual acuity and higher grades of diabetic retinopathy. Diabetic retinopathy continued to be significant in the multivariate analysis adjusted by age and sex (p 0.008, Odds Ratio 1.9, 95% CI 1.3-2.7).

Table 1. Comparison between people with and without glaucoma.


Characteristics

No glaucoma

Glaucoma

P-value

Age (years), mean ±SD

60.1 ± 12.1

60.2 ± 11.1

0.454

Gender

blanco

blanco

0.960

sangría female, N (%)

1523 (58.4)

81 (58.2)

blanco

Visual acuity

blanco

blanco

blanco

sangría uncorrected

blanco

blanco

blanco

sangría sangría OD, mean ±SD

0.7 ± 0.3

0.6 ± 0.3

<0.001

sangría sangría OS, mean ±SD

0.7 ± 0.3

0.5 ± 0.3

<0.001

sangría with pinhole

blanco

Blanco

blanco

sangría sangría OD, mean ±SD)

0.8 ± 0.2

0.8 ± 0.2

0.001

sangría sangría OS, mean ±SD

0.8 ± 0.2

0.7 ± 0.3

<0.001

Intraocular pressure

blanco

Blanco

blanco

sangría sangría OD, mean ±SD

15.6 ± 4.4

15.6 ± 4.0

0.492

sangría sangría OS, mean ±SD

16.0 ± 4.5

16.8 ± 5.2

0.734

DR

blanco

Blanco

0.001

sangría sangría no DR, N (%)

2059 (79.0)

92 (66.1)

 

sangría sangría mild NPDR, N (%)

284 (10.9)

27 (19.4)

 

sangría sangría moderate NPDR, N (%)

180 (6.9)

17 (12.2%)

 

sangría sangría severe NPDR, N (%)

73 (2.8)

2 (1.4)

 

sangría sangría PDR, N (%)

8 (0.3)

1 (0.7)

 

Current health, mean ±SD

79.2 ± 18.9

79.9 ± 18.8

0.662

Health status, N (%)

1665 (65.0%)

87 (63.5%)

0.714

DR: diabetic retinopathy. NPDR: non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy. PDR: proliferative diabetic retinopathy. SD: standard deviation. 95CI%: confidence interval 95%.

Discussion
The prevalence of glaucoma in this study was 5.0%. This is higher than other papers which studied people without diabetes. A recent meta-analysis estimated a global prevalence of glaucoma of 3,5% in people between 40 and 801. Different studies have associated diabetes mellitus with glaucoma20-22. Diabetes affects vascular tissues as well as neuronal and glial functions and metabolism in the retina, leading to apoptosis of retinal neurons, including ganglion cells. Impaired metabolism of neurons and glia by diabetes may make retinal ganglion cells more susceptible to stress related to open-angle glaucoma. Other factors that may accelerate the onset or aggravate the features of glaucoma include: increased transforming growth factor B; the formation of glycoproteoglycans in the iridocorneal angle; fibronectin deposits and cell depletion in the trabeculum23-25.
In addition, it was observed that people with glaucoma are twice as likely to have diabetic retinopathy. Scientific studies have already studied this association and there are different pathophysiological mechanisms that relate them11-17. These mechanisms include: increased oxidative stress, vascular dysregulation, glial cell dysfunction, axonal transport abnormalities, genetic polymorphisms, among others23-25.
On the other hand, new cases of ocular hypertension, having or are risk of developing glaucoma, were detected by the Program. From the total number of people evaluated, 11.4% had ocular hypertension. This group of people was referred for a second evaluation and follow-up by an ophthalmologist.
Regarding the use of telemedicine for early detection of glaucoma, it can be said that it is a controversial issue. The United States Preventive Services Task Force concluded in 2013 that there was insufficient scientific evidence to recommend the use of tele-screening in glaucoma6. However, some recent studies justify screening in the highest-risk population6. Intraocular pressure measurement was included as a screening strategy in La Pampa’s Program for many reasons: glaucoma meets the Frame and Carlson criteria; the population has great difficulties in accessing a specialist; the aforementioned association between diabetes mellitus and glaucoma; and the low cost and simplicity of incorporating a tonometer18-19.
The limitations of this study are related to the fact that: 1) the presence of glaucoma was based on patients’ self-reports, which could lead to lack of precision due to a recall bias; 2) the tonometer used for glaucoma screening usually provides pressure values slightly above a Goldman tonometer (the rebound tonometer continues to be recommended for screening programs).
Diabetic patients in La Pampa’s rural area have a high prevalence of glaucoma. Due to the association between both pathologies, glaucoma screening in early detection programs for diabetic retinopathy, is highly suggested.


References

  1. Tham YC, Li X, Wong TY et al. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology 2014; 121: 2081-2090.
  2. Zhang N, Wang J, Li Y, Jiang B. Prevalence of primary open angle glaucoma in the last 20 years: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Sci Rep 2021; 11: 13762.
  3. Kapetanakis VV, Chan MPY, Foster PJ et al. Global variations and time trends in the prevalence of primary open angle glaucoma (POAG): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Ophthalmol 2016; 100: 86-93.
  4. Franco PJ, Suwezda A, Schlottmann P et al. Analysis of visual disability in Buenos Aires, Argentina: pathologic myopia is the leading cause in working age. Medicina (B Aires) 2021; 81: 735-741.
  5. Consejo Argentino de Oftalmología (CAO). Campaña nacional de detección del glaucoma 2019 [online]. Buenos Aires: CAO, 2019. Available at: https://oftalmologos.org.ar/files/pacientes/glaucoma/estadisticas/glaucoma-estadisticas-2019.pdf
  6. Gan K, Liu Y, Stagg B et al. Telemedicine for glaucoma: guidelines and recommendations. Telemed J E Health 2020; 26: 551-555.
  7. Schuster AK, Wagner FM, Pfeiffer N, Hoffmann EM. Risk factors for open-angle glaucoma and recommendations for glaucoma screening. Ophthalmologe 2021; 118 (Suppl 2): 145-152.
  8. Kreft D, Doblhammer G, Guthoff RF, Frech S. Prevalence, incidence, and risk factors of primary open-angle glaucoma: a cohort study based on longitudinal data from a German public health insurance. BMC Public Health 2019; 19: 851.
  9. Grzybowski A, Och M, Kanclerz P et al. Primary open angle glaucoma and vascular risk factors: a review of population based studies from 1990 to 2019. J Clin Med 2020; 9: 761.
  10. Boyd K. What is glaucoma?: symptoms, causes, diagnosis, treatment [online]. San Francisco: American Academy of Ophthalmology, updated October 28, 2022. Available at: https://www.aao.org/eye-health/diseases/what-is-glaucoma
  11. Lee K, Yang H, Kim JY et al. Risk factors associated with structural progression in normal-tension glaucoma: intraocular pressure, systemic blood pressure, and myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2020; 61: 35.
  12. Li Y, Mitchell W, Elze T, Zebardast N. Association between diabetes, diabetic retinopathy, and glaucoma. Curr Diab Rep 2021; 21: 38.
  13. Zhao D, Cho J, Kim MH et al. Diabetes, fasting glucose, and the risk of glaucoma: a meta-analysis. Ophthalmology 2015; 122: 72-78.
  14. Zhou M, Wang W, Huang W, Zhang X. Diabetes mellitus as a risk factor for open-angle glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2014; 9: e102972.
  15. Ko F, Boland MV, Gupta P et al. Diabetes, triglyceride levels, and other risk factors for glaucoma in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005-2008. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2016; 57: 2152-2157.
  16. Rim TH, Lee SY, Bae HW et al. Increased risk of open-angle glaucoma among patients with diabetes mellitus: a 10-year follow-up nationwide cohort study. Acta Ophthalmol 2018; 96: e1025-e1030.
  17. Gangwani RA, McGhee SM, Lai JSM et al. Detection of glaucoma and its association with diabetic retinopathy in a diabetic retinopathy screening program. J Glaucoma 2016; 25: 101-105.
  18. Ortiz-Basso T, Paladini A. Evaluando posibles barreras y facilitadores para implementar un programa de tele-screening de retinopatía diabética en la Argentina. Oftalmol Clín Exp 2020; 13: 127-134.
  19. Ortiz-Basso T, Gomez PV, Boffelli A, Paladini A. Programa de teleoftalmología para prevención de la ceguera por diabetes en una zona rural de la Argentina. Rev Fac Cien Med Univ Nac Cordoba 2022; 79: 10-14.
  20. Wise LA, Rosenberg L, Radin RG et al. A prospective study of diabetes, lifestyle factors, and glaucoma among African-American women. Ann Epidemiol 2011; 21: 430-439.
  21. Chopra V, Varma R, Los Angeles Latino Eye Study Group et al. Type 2 diabetes mellitus and the risk of open-angle glaucoma the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study. Ophthalmology 2008; 115: 227-232
  22. Song BJ, Aiello LP, Pasquale LR. Presence and risk factors for glaucoma in patients with diabetes. Curr Diab Rep 2016; 16: 124.
  23. de Voogd S, Ikram MK, Wolfs RCW et al. Is diabetes mellitus a risk factor for open-angle glaucoma? The Rotterdam Study. Ophthalmology 2006; 113: 1827-1831.
  24. Park CH, Kim JW. Effect of advanced glycation end products on oxidative stress and senescence of trabecular meshwork cells. Korean J Ophthalmol 2012; 26: 123-131.
  25. Newman-Casey PA, Talwar N, Nan B et al. The relationship between components of metabolic syndrome and open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2011; 118: 1318-1326.